Rock, Paper, Scissors and Alternative Dispute Resolution

Recently a federal judge from Orlando, Florida,encyclopedia. According to the Official Rock,
brought the children's game of Rock, Paper,Paper, Scissors Strategy Guide (available at
Scissors to national attention through ForbesAmazon.com), early Homo sapiens played a
Magazine and Datelined June 7, 2006, Fortunepredecessor game about 50,000 B.C. "to resolve
writer Roger Parloff describes two lawyers in afood and mating disputes." This game only
federal case who could not agree on the place forinvolved a rock (scissors were not invented until
a deposition even though their offices were foursixth century Italy). The 'thrower' tried to place
floors apart in the same building. Rather thanthe fist-rock on the 'catcher's' body, while the
deciding the matter, Judge Presnell ordered each'catcher' tried to avoid this by positioning his hand
attorney to the steps of the federal courthouseto catch the rock. After switching positions, the
on June 30, 2006, accompanied by a paralegal'thrower' who placed the most rocks on the
witness, to play one dispositive round of rock,'catcher's' body won.
paper, scissors - with the winner to choose theIt appears that the Japanese invented the
location for the deposition so long as it was inmodern, tripartite game they call Janken, based
Hillsborough County, Florida. Apparently intimidatedon the Guu Choki Paa way of thinking: "the snake
by the threat of playing rock, paper, scissors, thefears the slug; the slug fears the frog, and the
World RPS Society ( reported on June 9th thatfrog fears the snake." Moving away from snakes,
"the attorneys have worked out our differencesslugs and frogs, the Japanese developed a new
by agreement. We will not have to resort toversion where "the tiger feared the warrior, the
combat by RPS." The judge has since withdrawnwarrior feared his mother, and the warrior's
its order.mother feared the tiger." Marco Polo reportedly
One may think that the "Rock, Paper, Scissors"brought this game back to Europe, and the
game is an "arbitrary" way to make decisions. InVenetian traders changed it to rock, paper, blade
Hindson v. Allstate Ins. Co., 694 A.2d 682, 685to settle trade disputes. One of the most amusing
(R.I. 1997) the court was faced with allocatingvariations of the game comes from Indonesia and
coverage among various insurance carriers whereapparently involved an elephant, a person, and an
none would admit to primary coverage. The courtant. The elephant can crush the person, the
considered using a "rock, paper, scissors"person can crush the ant, but how can the ant
approach to determine which carriers shouldwin against the elephant? It crawls in the
provide primary coverage to the claims at issue,elephant's ear and drives the elephant crazy.
but considered that approach to be "arbitrary." InThe game may have migrated to the United
that case, the court opted to "halt the incessantStates via Jean Baptiste. Jean Baptise was the
'battle of the draftsmen' waged by, between, andFrench general who helped George Washington
among the various insurance companies" byduring the American Revolution. It is unknown as
finding that the coverage responsibilities of allto why this game came to be associated with
insurers should be shared on a pro-rata basis.the Count of Rochambeau, but it does raise
Notwithstanding the reluctance of the Rhodequestions as to the means by which Washington
Island court to use "rock, paper, scissors,"secured Cornwallis' surrender in Yorktown.
variations of "rock, paper, scissors" have beenNevertheless, this theory may explain why the
used for dispute resolution for more than 50,000game is often called, "rochambeau," or,
years, according to Wikipedia, the free online"roshambo.